Senior Advocate

GAVIN DUGMORE SC

Background

Coming Soon

Contact Information

Work Number:

046 622 2154

Cell Number:

082 578 2336

Email:

agdugmore@gmail.com

Cases of interest in which dugmore SC appeared include:

5

S v Arends1988 (4) SA 792 (E);

5

Bovungana v RAF 2009 (4) SA 123 (E);

5

Deutschmann NO & Others v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service; Shelton v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service 2000 (2) SA 106 (E) – appeared as junior to Smuts SC;

5

Pete’s Warehousing and Sales CC v Bowsink Investments CC 2000 (3) SA 833 (E);

5

Keyter NO v Van Der Meulen and Another NNO 2014 (5) SA 215 (ECG);

5

RAF v Mtati 2005 (6) SA 215 (SCA);

RAF v Mtati 2005 (6) SA 215 (SCA), in which the court clarified the principles of delictual liability insofar as they relate to injuries to the foetus in utero and confirmed that reliance on the so called nasciturus principle was not required. In reaching its decision the court also identified the delictual principles that might be applicable in respect of claims for injuries occasioned prior to conception.

5

Shelton v Commissioner, South African Revenue Service 2002 (2) SA 9 (SCA) – junior to Smuts SC;

5

RAF v Mehlomakulu 2009 (5) SA 390 (E);

5

Kambule v Kambule 1998 (2) AllSA 278 (E);

5

Tom v Minister of Safety and Security 1998 (1) AllSA 629 (E);

5

Cronje v Oeschger [1998] JOL 2370 (E) – marked reportable;

5

Ndatshe v MMVAF 2000 JOL 7216 (E) – marked reportable;

5

Standard General Insurance Co. Ltd v Alec Gavin Dugmore NO 1997 (1) SA 33 (SCA) – where I was involved as curator ad litem; and

Standard General Insurance Co. Ltd v Alec Gavin Dugmore NO 1997 (1) SA 33 (SCA), in which I was involved in the case strategy, and in which the court clarified and applied the complex rules applicable to the law of damages in respect of res inter alios actae.

5

 Minister of Safety & Security v Tyokwana 827/13 [2014] ZASCA 130 (23 September 2014) – appeared as junior to Smuts SC.

Minister of Safety & Security v Tyokwana 827/13 [2014] ZASCA 130 (23 September 2014), in which the court clarified the law applicable to the liability of the State in respect of periods of detention following an accused’s first appearance before a Magistrate in terms of the Criminal Procedure Act.